Own hardware (Garmin GPSmap 64s killer)

Hrabosh shared this idea 7 years ago
Gathering feedback

Have you ever thought about you own hardvare?


When I talk to more more conservative guys about Locus they still complain about the same. They missed "OEAV maps", they haven't been satisfied with OSM. That's solved now. From my point of view is Locus now capable to be software competitor to Garmin GPSmap 64s https://www.alpenverein.at/shop/shop/artikel.php?h_no=90012 .


But they still complain about:

waterproof/waterestistance

overall toughness

tiny GPS/GLONASS/GALILEO antenna in common phones

Build-in battery

and capability of using navigation in gloves


Have you been thinking about introducing your own hardware to satisfy (some of) those requrements and offer it with your SW?


I can imagine Android device with good satellite support, removable battery and waterproof/shockproof case. Even without simcard slot.


I know that hardware is not you bussines right now, but I think that this could be good opportunity. Now you sell Locus map for 7€ (and you earn little more money from selling maps I guess), you could sell devices for completely different price.

Replies (5)

photo
2

Hi,


no, we haven't thought about producing our own hardware, to be sure :) Although your idea makes sense to some extent, however, inventing, designing, developing, testing and mass manufacturing of a single-purpose device for a market packed with Garmins, Tomtoms, Polars and other gadgets sounds quite like a "challenge".

photo
1

Not necessarily. For example you can go to alibaba and ask if someone is capable to produce something like http://www.iget.eu/cs/blackview-bv6000 without GSM, camera and other stuff that is not necessary for navigation.


Then you can go to Kickstarter and test if customers are interested.


If I start to explain to my friends that they can buy a phone, then application, became familiar with application, then maps, then Brouter... They want to buy all-in-one solution. I would buy an rugged Locus navigation with lifetime pre-paid maps and everything ready to go beside my phone if it was for reasonable price. At least I wouldn't have to fear of smashing the phone when riding a bike :-)

photo
1

I think the demand for one-purpose navigation devices is fully covered by Garmins, TomToms etc. and their Chinese copies. We aren't going to enter this market. You are proposing a rugged phone with Locus only - why if you can buy it now and use it for more purposes? There are a lot of people who don't want to haul another thing in their pocket when they can have a multipurpose device that can communicate, navigate and take photos. And can be tough as your proposed iGet.


At the moment we're thinking about different things that are much more realistic and executable in our small team and which will take our time for several years ahead - complete server side support of synchronizing Locus user data, web e-shop etc. etc.

photo
1

We're talking about OUTDOOR/CYCLING navigation. Tomtom doesn't produce any outdoor navigation at all. If you want to have outdoor navigation to Alps you have two general options (in Czech rep.). Either you can buy Garmin for 350€ and SD card with topo maps for 100€. Then you can buy another SD card with maps of Czech rep (for next 100€). Or you can buy Teasi one for approximately 200€ with OSM, but I don't find it as competitor at all (lacks lots of functions/maps and so). For example there is no way to use IGN maps (France, Switzerland). In short- you can either buy VERY expansive Garmin or navigation from stone age.

Why I seek for single purpose "phone" with PREINSTALLED Locus?

The device (hardware) would be far cheaper. You can have rugged phone with GSM functions, camera, 8 cores for 350€. But for Locus you need device that costs 100-150€. Low price is nice "feature" if you're afraid of smashing the navigation.

In general I'm not keen on idea of hauling rugged phone to the office, to the bars and so. And who would buy "city"phone and another "outdoor" phone? In fact most of Locus users uses their common phones, but with its limitations - usually not waterproof and with short batterylife. As I do. But I have problems if it rains. And I'm fearing smashing Xiaomi when attached on hadlebars.

Even though I treat myself as power user, it would take me several hours setup everything. Order a phone, install locus, buy maps, install Brouter, underclock processor. Well, I can do that. Less power users won't. How many subscriptions you have to sell to get 500€ that Garmin gets from single user (trust me, Garmin hardware is cheap crap)?

As there are users who wants to have just one multi-purpose device there are many customers who wants to have single purpose device. I know many people who uses dummy phones, who fears of drying phone battery, or are simply more conservative. Is there any reason to refuse their money?

-----------------------

I think that the idea is quite simple to process. Some basic research, test and then you can probe the interest on Kickstarter. If you get positive reaction, you get the money to widen your team.

photo
photo
1

Rather than getting involved in the hardware business, Asamm might consider licensing a re-branded version of Locus Map to Garmin. It would be superior to "Garmin Navigator" (last updated August 2015???) and they would collect royalties and not be concerned about supply chains, production forecasts, inventory, distribution, product returns, servicing, etc.


Of course, they would first have to improve support for IMG files! ;)

photo
2

Guys, thanks for the idea again but even after considering your arguments we in our team agreed that it's quite out of our range of activity. "Some basic research" you propose is just a naive imagination, the process would be much more complicated. Locus doesn't need just GPS - it works with all sensors of a smartphone including GSM module that it needs for online services so it would be meaningless to develop our own device when there are hundreds on the market. Secondly, we don't think we would get under price of this device you're talking about, Taras D: https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/US/p/113522.

photo
1

There are two general points in my opening text. Since there is strong synergy between them, I've mixed them up. You didn't get any.

First: horrible user experience (UX) with Locus if you're not power user. Sorry, but it's really bad. I have friends, smart and clever, who goes to mountains with me. They're interested in Locus. But when I start to explain them what they have to do to get IGN map of Mont Blanc into their pocket, they refuses me with something like "thank you, but I'm looking for something that really works. I'm not gonna to play with the phone, I'm not looking for a fathers toy." So they buy Garmin. Or they installs Mapy.cz (nice UX, user gets offline data with just a few clicks). They treat selecting proper device as a part of "playing with mobile" that they refuse to do (and, to be honest, the're right). So answering to this with "there are hundreds of devices" is completely meaningless :-) Offering them some proper device would help them a lot.

Second: you did not get use case I'm writing about at all. I'm not writing about Saturday afternoon trip to Brdy (hills close to Prague). I'm writing about Alps. For example you can imagine trip to Grossvenediger: http://www.gps-tracks.com/grossvenediger-3674-m.%C3%BC.m.-skitour-S02221.html One of the "key feature" of a such trip in Alps is that for most of the trip there is no fucking GSM signal at all. So one of the first think you intentionally do is turning GSM services off. Because it drains the battery, since phone uses full power output when it tries to connect. Anyone who relies on online data in Alps is, ehm, fool. If you're not Austrian (I'm not) you probably do not want to pay for roamed data.

Next we're talking about trips that last for 10+ hours. On a such trip you want to make whole trip with no need of recharging and you want to have a reasonable power reserve at the end of the day (or even enough power for two days). How many phones manages to last with running Locus for, lets say, 20+ hours? Finally, there sometimes happens that it rains. Peoples are usually not carrying an umbrella to cover the device when they need to look at the map. So they need waterproof device. So there is need of waterproof phone with big memory and good battery. Hundreds of devices you say? Nope. Just a few.

Some basic research is not a naive imagination. It's as simple as picking a phone and calling to Krno (I hope you would survive their weird accent), to developers of iGet and ask them if it was possible to adapt their device to better fit needs of Locus users.

Monterra cost $650. You can have brand new iGet (or some other rugged phone) for less than half. Other $300 would be just for installing Locus itself. Maps are subject of another puchase ($100+ for each). You say that $300-400 is not enough to install Locus on Android phone? Well, it's not super-easy, but I'd do that for you as part-time job if you pay me $200 for each installed device.

Bottom-lines: I do not want to compare Locus to Mapy.cz, I'm just comparing UX with setup of application of inexperienced newbie.

You sometimes do some tests. give newbie phone in factory reset and tell him that he wants to do Tour du Mont Blanc and there is a nice payed map of Mont Blanc and free detailed overall map of whole Alps for Locus. I really wonder how many would get proper IGN and OpenAndroMaps and how long it would take them. With Garmin you can purchase it with just a few clicks in e-shop.

photo
1

My phone has a 3630 mAh battery. Ten hours of GPS usage (in Airplane Mode) consumes about 25% of the battery's capacity. If I need more capacity, I can buy a lightweight, inexpensive, external battery pack like this one: https://www.amazon.com/bar-Sized-Portable-External-High-Speed-Technology/dp/B00P7Q5778

My phone has a water-resistant coating which means a few raindrops aren't a threat. Otherwise, I can buy a protective water-proof case for it. Or I can replace it with a water-proof phone.


In one comment you suggest Asamm should offer a new hardware product. In another comment you indicate "horrible user experience (UX) with Locus if you're not power user. Sorry, but it's really bad." This means Asamm must not only get involved in the hardware business but also develop an entirely new version of Locus Map for it.

I respect your suggestion but I can understand why Michael thinks it is "out of range" of their normal activity.

I'd rather see Asamm continue to focus on enhancing Locus Map rather than direct their development energy elsewhere.

photo
photo
1

This is for illustraton: http://www.nakole.cz/diskuse/21567-jakou-cyklonavigaci.html I do not know the guy and we didn't talk to each other.

Ano, už i já prošel postupným vývojem od papírové mapy k mapě elektronické. :-)

Zatím jen v mobilu a začínám přemýšlet o opravdové navigaci.

Co jsem sondoval trh. Je to u nás celkem bída.

Asi nejvíc mě zaujala Teasi One 3 (starší model používal Jindra).

Další možnost by byl nějaký z levných Garminů.

Výhody Teasi: cena, bezplatná aktualizace map, 3 roky záruka

nevýhody: vestavěná bateie, jen GPS výškoměr

Jaké jsou vaše rady a postřehy?

A opravdu nechci chytrý telefon, ale opravdovou navigaci. .-)

Short translation: Yes, even I went through evolution from paper map to electronic one. Now just in phone, but I'm thinking about real navigaton.

(...)

And I really do not want smartphone, but real navigation .-)

What is answer of Locus team? Buy smartphone.

photo
1

Dear Hrabosh,

Michal is on vacation this week and I hope that he use his smartphone outdoor :). So I try to response but I guess that the all important things were already mentioned above. You wrote that there are two main problems: 1) poor UX of Locus app and no suitable device that would fit your needs. Well:

1) UX - You're lucky man because I can deeply understand you. The UX is big challenge for us. On the other hand it's long long story and I would rather discuss about it with beer in pub. I admit that we should do more for it. We sometime perform usability testing with our users and I guess that we were already in touch because usability testing. Well we can discuss about it on next testing.

BTW: I don't really understand how would custom device improve the usability of Locus app.

2) Device, etc.

In first step is needed to say: what Locus is and where users use it? It's only app and there isn't whole ecosystem around it. Yes, it would be great to have the World of Locus with whatever you can imagine. But Locus is still project of 4 people. We can not compare with Garmin, with thousands of employees and long history. So we should focus on steps that we can manage or that are in our range.

But back to "What Locus is". With all respect I really guess that you see Locus only from your point of view. I agree that for Mont Blank you probably need superior device, but is it vital for the most of our users? I don't think so. I always say - we don't need a feature that would use less as 20% our users. The reality in Locus app is different but this is another story. I only want to say that your needs can be quite specific. There are still big group users that use Locus ocasionaly only for short trip.

But this is not the key point. It's also about our possibilities. For example only mentioned IGN maps took 6 months of preparation. The technical implementation took couple days but the negotiation, preparation of contract, system of payment, etc took months. I don't want to imagine how complicated would be to prepare negotiate own device. There would be also technical complications, you'd need mentioned ecosystem around the product, the global distribution, etc, etc....uff.

Well it's interesting idea, I can understand your needs, it makes sense but honestly it's ...sci-fi for us :)

Thank you for idea maybe one day...

Best regards

Petr

Leave a Comment
 
Attach a file