Hi, 2: I have checked the situation and I can confirm I can import all the wpts of the multicaches by choosing ignore, however this really clutters the map. You have kindly sent me a gc.com gpx file, but I had to find another as it did not have any waypoints due to calculations. My bad, but someone was kind enough to send me one to compare. I have attached those - they are the same cache. (Some gc.hu caches might be found on gc.com, they are identical) What I have seen is that: - gc.com uses two files (that's how they were sent to me via e-mail from gc.com system): one GC18B7H.gpx and one GC18B7H-wpts.gpx. The GC18B7H.gpx contains the first cache and the waypoints are in the GC18B7H-wpts.gpx file. They are referenced by their names: P218B7H, P318B7H, etc. - gc.hu uses one file: GCPASA.gpx. There are parts that repeat themselves and contain the waypoints. GCPASA-1860-1 is the name of first of those and it is the same as GC18B7H.gpx The GCPASA-1860-2, GCPASA-1860-3, etc. are the waypoints. (Unfortunately the long description is included with every waypoint, that is of course absolutely unnecessary and do not have to be included.) Only the coords + name + icon + the contents of the inner square brackets from this are needed: -----> "Pasaréti templom" So actually the names are different and make it possible to separate them from one another. Is it this way possible for Locus to handle this situation? 3: You are right about checking for > < is not right. Hiding them may also not be a good idea, you are right. Well, I thought about it and realised, that actually what disturbes me is the unnecessary technical characters that are displayed. So from the source: """ 2. pont &gt;coord lat="N 47° 30,906'" lon="E 19° 00,065'" altitude="154" multi="v" icon="32" description="Gábor Áron emlémű"&lt; A jelszó 2. része az emlékmű készítő vezetéknevének első betűje. """ This should be made: """ 2. pont "N 47° 30,906' E 19° 00,065' 154m Gábor Áron emlékmű" A jelszó 2. része az emlékmű készítő vezetéknevének első betűje. """ I guess "&gt;coord lat="" and ""&lt;" together should be safe to find these parts. The website also displays it similarily: http://geocaching.hu/caches.geo?id=1874