Is the new geocaching listing-desing because of changes from groundspeak?

Nicolai shared this question 2 years ago
Answered

Good day,


this was the old listing design:

/6kDgAAACDjEFQAAAAASIegAgAAAEA6BBUAAAAA0iGoAAAAAJAOQQUAAACAdAgqAAAAAKRDUAEAAAAgHYIKAAAAAOkQVAAAAABIh6ACAAAAQDoEFQAAAADSIagAAAAAkA5BBQAAAIB0CCoAAAAApENQAQAAACAddXp6Ot11AAAAAICPoUUFAAAAgHQIKgAAAACkQ1ABAAAAIB2CCgAAAADpEFQAAAAASIegAgAAAEA6BBUAAAAA0iGoAAAAAJAOQQUAAACAdAgqAAAAAKRDUAEAAAAgHYIKAAAAAOkQVAAAAABIh6ACAAAAQDoEFQAAAADSIagAAAAAkA5BBQAAAIB0CCoAAAAApENQAQAAACAdggoAAAAA6RBUAAAAAEiHoAIAAABAOgQVAAAAANL5XzWPexo8hiRWAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC


and this is the new listing design:

/gsYsBeXSoZRywAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

were there any changes from groundspeak, that the listing desing changed?

Because I find the old design much better. You have an better overview.


Thanks in advance!

Comments (5)

photo
1

Hello Nicolai,

Unfortunately the last change made on Grounspeak side caused returning back the restriction/limitation to download full geocache detail up to 3 geocaches per day for basic members. The Geocaching4Locus add-on doesn't try to restrict basic members with this. That mean the listing, hint, images, logs and trackables can't be downloaded*. As a workaround for missing listing the add-on place Geocache webpage to listing tab, but you have to be on-line to load that webpage. Hint is of course written in webpage too.

*Note: Logs and trackables can be downloaded later with Update cache action in a geocache detail dialog.

Premium members doesn't have this limitation and full geocache detail is stored offline.

photo
1

ok thanks for enlightenment


That means there is no possibillity to save listing from geocaches to use it offline?


That was an really bad change from groundspeak

photo
photo
1

ok thanks for enlightenment

Does that mean that there is no possibillity to save listing from geocaches to use it offline?

That was an really bad change from groundspeak

photo
1

For basic members no chance at the moment.

For premium members it works.

photo
1

Hmm thats really really bad

photo