Profile planner problems

Jon Reed shared this question 31 hours ago
Answered

I've been experiencing issues getting the planner to follow cycle routes in the Ruhr area. On Touring cycle it tries to route me off canal / railway purple paths to the road. On Road cycle it sometimes prefers the purple rail / canal routes, but both still often won't take me often on sections of purple cycle path unless I set points every few metres.


Is there a way to tell the profile to prefe cycle routes to roads? And is this new behaviour - I've been using Locus for at least 5 months a year every year for a long time and have never experienced such a frustrating time planning routes.


And I still really struggle with the changing profile from touring to pedestrian etc to see if that will route me through an area and always forget to continue with. That just makes no sense to me. Continue with should be the default, reroute the whole route and option.

Replies (2)

photo
1

I noticed this on a recent cycling holiday too. There were sealed canal paths, but the route had chosen the close-by road. Now I try to remember where, and re-create an example route, but it has chosen the canal path. So maybe it has improved? For best objective comparison, you need to provide a URL to reproduce any issue. For example https://link.locusmap.app/r/6rxtmd

photo
1

Thanks for the suggestion. Here's a brief route. If I try planning it as a Tourer it takes me off the Leinpfad cycle route by the river, the one that tourers would undoubtedly want to take and sends me off on an 11.3km 71m climb route. If I pick MTB it follows the flat 9km 4m up route. gravel behaves like tourer and Road like MTB.

photo
1

Your GPX contains 250 track points all along the track. It is not a route containing a few shaping or via points. But interesting, when I load into the Web planner only 3 points are in the list (start, middle & end). Sample screen cap shows the Web planner "middle" point:

f32334b01d55b4d3d4afdc26b06c635821557af74565312af09841d5d8dde404

37177b81eaef95eccc97a9bc594c7704c319bfdad48a388b1161f0dc34094ebe


I don't know where the "71m" climb is? Please be more specific. The sample GPX has followed the EV5 (+/-3m). Isn't that correct? This section below appears to follow the sealed part:

8756e9699c3b1e9381516ac168b2cfd3ec3381f78c81ff0f95f0f129e30a8a9f

photo
Leave a Comment
 
Attach a file