This object is in archive! 
Also EXport track color/style to GPX
Completed
It‘s nice that Locus can import track style from GPX files (see
http://www.locusmap.eu/news-in-version-2-19-0/ ). If Locus could also export the simple track styles (so not those like altitude depending
color) to GPX, the loop would be closed - it would be possible to
export as GPX & edit on PC & re-import, or to transfer single tracks
between several Locus instances - all without loss of style information.
Similar topic for KML: http://help.locusmap.eu/responses/export_tracks_to_kml_kmz_with_preserving_their_appearance
Similar topic for KML: http://help.locusmap.eu/responses/export_tracks_to_kml_kmz_with_preserving_their_appearance
Add support for export of <color> and <width> to track.
Only what I'm thinking about is whether export this style in all cases or only if "Use folder style" is disabled.
Because if you export track with style that use "style of folder", then after re-import, it will has same colour as before (so same as was in folder), but it will not use "Style of folder" anymore. On second side, it will use "style of folder", but colour should not be same (because it depend on a folder).
Anyway, for now, I set to export it everytime, because I think that keeping a style is more important then keeping a "use style of folder" button.
Add support for export of <color> and <width> to track.
Only what I'm thinking about is whether export this style in all cases or only if "Use folder style" is disabled.
Because if you export track with style that use "style of folder", then after re-import, it will has same colour as before (so same as was in folder), but it will not use "Style of folder" anymore. On second side, it will use "style of folder", but colour should not be same (because it depend on a folder).
Anyway, for now, I set to export it everytime, because I think that keeping a style is more important then keeping a "use style of folder" button.
I'll try the implementation in next version - whichever way it will be, it will be better than now :)
I'll try the implementation in next version - whichever way it will be, it will be better than now :)
Replies have been locked on this page!