This object is in archive! 
Nearest points list shouldn't (by default) show a point 1,000km away
Completed
I love the Nearest Points screen, but when most points are hidden there is possibility that a visible point half way around the world will make it into the list. This doesn't make sense. A point 1,000km away is not a Nearest Point. I suggest allowing a radius to be defined. Only points within a given distance, maybe default to 10km? will show in the list.
I also had rare cases when very distant points have been listed, but not those nearby - visible and invisible alike.
If that happens again, I need to report an error ...
I also had rare cases when very distant points have been listed, but not those nearby - visible and invisible alike.
If that happens again, I need to report an error ...
Hi guys,
@Michael, are you certain that some points were missing? This really should not happen.
And about this idea ... well, I may limit maximal distance for visible points, it's not a big problem. Anyway optional configuration for such settings looks for me like nonsense, so how to decide which value is optimal? Hard question.
So improvements here is mainly a cosmetic one right? It is not a real problem with usage ...
Hi guys,
@Michael, are you certain that some points were missing? This really should not happen.
And about this idea ... well, I may limit maximal distance for visible points, it's not a big problem. Anyway optional configuration for such settings looks for me like nonsense, so how to decide which value is optimal? Hard question.
So improvements here is mainly a cosmetic one right? It is not a real problem with usage ...
> so how to decide which value is optimal
Not so hard, let the user decide, there is no optimal value as it will depend on the users circumstance, but I thought a default of 10km seemed reasonable.
>cosmetic
yes, but nearest point 1700km away is not near, it's silly
> so how to decide which value is optimal
Not so hard, let the user decide, there is no optimal value as it will depend on the users circumstance, but I thought a default of 10km seemed reasonable.
>cosmetic
yes, but nearest point 1700km away is not near, it's silly
I haven't used Nearest Points yet but it does make sense that it should exclude excessively distant points.
I believe the concept of "Nearest" depends on the activity. 10 km radius for hiking is reasonable whereas 50 km is excessive. However, if one is driving, 10 km is rather close and 50 km isn't unreasonable. Therefore Andrew's suggestion makes sense: the user should have control over the "search radius" for "Nearest Points".
If one wants to get fancy, the search radius can be tied to the activity. For example, here are suggestions for default values:
However, I would be satisfied with a single, user-defined setting in the app (as shown in Andrew's example) or, at the very least, in the configuration file.
I haven't used Nearest Points yet but it does make sense that it should exclude excessively distant points.
I believe the concept of "Nearest" depends on the activity. 10 km radius for hiking is reasonable whereas 50 km is excessive. However, if one is driving, 10 km is rather close and 50 km isn't unreasonable. Therefore Andrew's suggestion makes sense: the user should have control over the "search radius" for "Nearest Points".
If one wants to get fancy, the search radius can be tied to the activity. For example, here are suggestions for default values:
However, I would be satisfied with a single, user-defined setting in the app (as shown in Andrew's example) or, at the very least, in the configuration file.
Hi guys,
thanks for a feedback. In next version will be nearest points limited to max. 100 km.
Hi guys,
thanks for a feedback. In next version will be nearest points limited to max. 100 km.
Replies have been locked on this page!