This object is in archive!
Tree structure of folders
Completed
Folders for points can contain points only. It would be fine if it can contain another folders as well.
I have about 40 different categories of points. Some of them have own folder, some of them are grouped to one folder. The work with it would be much easier if I can have folder under folder.
Thank you,
Dan
I like this idea 
Great Idea!
Great Idea!
Menion, do you have some opinion about this idea? Thanks.
Menion, do you have some opinion about this idea? Thanks.
This feature is already implemented in Locus Pro (I think version 2.18.0+)
In Data > Points/Tracks menu is ability to define Groups and in every Folders settings is possibility to choose into which group edited folder belongs
This feature is already implemented in Locus Pro (I think version 2.18.0+)
In Data > Points/Tracks menu is ability to define Groups and in every Folders settings is possibility to choose into which group edited folder belongs
In actualy version are possible to create only one level of folders, no more. But I think, this idea are about more levels of folder for POI - menas folder inside other folder of POI.
In actualy version are possible to create only one level of folders, no more. But I think, this idea are about more levels of folder for POI - menas folder inside other folder of POI.
Sorry Pavel, deeper structure is not planned.
Sorry Pavel, deeper structure is not planned.
Why not ? It's little bit chaotics to organize similar POI through different country (for example). Isn't needed to a lot of levels, only two, for somebody maybe three will be good, I think.
Why not ? It's little bit chaotics to organize similar POI through different country (for example). Isn't needed to a lot of levels, only two, for somebody maybe three will be good, I think.
1. Because it's a lot more work then it may looks.
2. I think this idea was only about one level of depth, which is already implemented.
3. It's not "must have" feature, because there is always possibility to organize own data in better way to fit current two level structure.
1. Because it's a lot more work then it may looks.
2. I think this idea was only about one level of depth, which is already implemented.
3. It's not "must have" feature, because there is always possibility to organize own data in better way to fit current two level structure.
Replies have been locked on this page!