This object is in archive! 
Autodetect and select navigation points from simple waypoints in a trackfile
Completed
Autodetect and select Navigation points from simple Waypoints in a trackfile with merged single (way)points.
Single points identical in position AND timestamp with single trackpoints are promoted to Navigation Points, and selected by the Navigation system. All other single points are to be considered as simple waypoints, and selected by the POI alert system. This should allow flexible support of ALL Navigation(course)points, including free waypoints and be fully compatible with idea:
http://help.locusmap.eu/topic/edit-track-creation-of-waypoints
more info:
http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg36848#msg36848
Auto detector navigation points ? It is very well.
Voted !
Auto detector navigation points ? It is very well.
Voted !
Willy, when you say "trackfile" I guess you mean TCX format file? If Locus compatibility/ interoperability with Garmin GPSs, Garmin software (Training Center), and other online websites that can import/ export TCX files is implied in your suggestion, then maybe it needs to be stated more explicitly?
Willy, when you say "trackfile" I guess you mean TCX format file? If Locus compatibility/ interoperability with Garmin GPSs, Garmin software (Training Center), and other online websites that can import/ export TCX files is implied in your suggestion, then maybe it needs to be stated more explicitly?
Hello guys,
if I understand correctly, you want to import track together with waypoints, merge them together and use attached waypoints during navigation right?
In this case, I think waypoints are already correctly attached in Locus, but I do not understand how to use them. Every navigation waypoint in Locus, needs to have an "command". Defined action that should happen on certain place. And common waypoints do not have this command. Or am I missing something? Thanks
Hello guys,
if I understand correctly, you want to import track together with waypoints, merge them together and use attached waypoints during navigation right?
In this case, I think waypoints are already correctly attached in Locus, but I do not understand how to use them. Every navigation waypoint in Locus, needs to have an "command". Defined action that should happen on certain place. And common waypoints do not have this command. Or am I missing something? Thanks
What is the problem ?
- Garmin .tcx: Navigation by associated Coursepoints, no free Waypoints support.
- Popular .gpx: Supports free Waypoints, not recognising associated (nav)Waypoints.
What is the current behaviour of Locus ?
- Use .tcx for strict Navigation only or .gpx for free Waypoints info only.
How should Locus work in the future ?
- Support both, and Navigationpoint and Waypoint styles using popular gpx. (page 1 linked pdf)
Locus finds selects and promotes associated points into Navigation points (page 3 linked pdf)
Generating strict timed Navigation commands and free Waypoint info messages.
Info: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3fmpc56xb7b8xfo/Navpoint_Waypoint%20guide.pdf?dl=0
What is the problem ?
- Garmin .tcx: Navigation by associated Coursepoints, no free Waypoints support.
- Popular .gpx: Supports free Waypoints, not recognising associated (nav)Waypoints.
What is the current behaviour of Locus ?
- Use .tcx for strict Navigation only or .gpx for free Waypoints info only.
How should Locus work in the future ?
- Support both, and Navigationpoint and Waypoint styles using popular gpx. (page 1 linked pdf)
Locus finds selects and promotes associated points into Navigation points (page 3 linked pdf)
Generating strict timed Navigation commands and free Waypoint info messages.
Info: https://www.dropbox.com/s/3fmpc56xb7b8xfo/Navpoint_Waypoint%20guide.pdf?dl=0
Willy,
I might be mistaken, but the way I understand it, this would "promote" all waypoints that I set with Locus while recording to navpoint when I re-import an exported track. So right now, the way it's phrased, it's not compatible with my idea you linked above.
Could you please rephrase this, otherwise I'll have to vote it down...
Willy,
I might be mistaken, but the way I understand it, this would "promote" all waypoints that I set with Locus while recording to navpoint when I re-import an exported track. So right now, the way it's phrased, it's not compatible with my idea you linked above.
Could you please rephrase this, otherwise I'll have to vote it down...
Another thing:
With the above idea, exporting a (recorded) track and reimporting it in Locus wouldn't lead to the same track. I think exporting should be usable for backup purposes, so with that idea, it wouldn't be anymore.
-> Cannot support, sorry...
Another thing:
With the above idea, exporting a (recorded) track and reimporting it in Locus wouldn't lead to the same track. I think exporting should be usable for backup purposes, so with that idea, it wouldn't be anymore.
-> Cannot support, sorry...
I suppose this brings no change for your use. Track import with or without associated waypoints, they just stay simple waypoints. Because the main change, recognise associated points happens after pushing the Navigation button. Not using navigation, I think you will not observe a change.
I suppose this brings no change for your use. Track import with or without associated waypoints, they just stay simple waypoints. Because the main change, recognise associated points happens after pushing the Navigation button. Not using navigation, I think you will not observe a change.
A Renewed request, triggered by evolution and recent new Navigation *experiences using Locus version 3.18.9.8.
Recognise three gpx associated Waypoints as Navigation Direction Points, promotes a gpx file as Navigation file with already integrated instructions.
Or use a very similar technique for gpx file navigation as existing system in use for tcx course navigation.
Locus NAVIGATION ! If importing a gpx file and associated waypoints, SET merge track and points !
Tcx courses(tracks) and associated coursepoints(waypoints)
Coursepoints are Locus "Priority_Points" TTS announced with symbol display in "Navigation_Button".
Out of all (16) Coursepoints, 3 Coursepoints have the special status to be "Navigation Points" TTS announced with symbol display in Navigation_Button
Left Direction by Coursepoint <PointType> Left.
Right Direction by coursepoint <PointType> Right.
Straight Direction by coursepoint <PointType> Straight.
Gpx navigation_track and associated waypoints. A tcx clone by gpx.
Associated waypoints are Locus "Priority_Points" TTS announced with symbol display in "Navigation_button".
Out of ALL associated waypoints, 3 waypoints should have the special status to be "Navigation Points" TTS announced with symbol display in Navigation_Button.
Left Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White/Red OR Left.
Right Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White/Green OR Right.
Straight Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White OR Straight.
In zip attachment test example files. Start Navigate (simulate). By actual Locus version 3.18.9.8.
- tcx course files with 2 additional Priority Points.
Navigation TTS announced and <Notes> of both Navigation and Priority_ Points as text display in the map top info bar.
- gpx navigation track with some additonal demo Priority Points.
* Actual version not recognising the 3 integrated L/R/S 'Navigation_Points", Locus adds own generated instructions :-(( Also does not display the <desc> information of points into the maps top information bar :-((
* Displays ALL (= more than +16) standard known waypoints Icons (Locus Priority Points) in the Navigation Button :-))
More info: http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
A Renewed request, triggered by evolution and recent new Navigation *experiences using Locus version 3.18.9.8.
Recognise three gpx associated Waypoints as Navigation Direction Points, promotes a gpx file as Navigation file with already integrated instructions.
Or use a very similar technique for gpx file navigation as existing system in use for tcx course navigation.
Locus NAVIGATION ! If importing a gpx file and associated waypoints, SET merge track and points !
Tcx courses(tracks) and associated coursepoints(waypoints)
Coursepoints are Locus "Priority_Points" TTS announced with symbol display in "Navigation_Button".
Out of all (16) Coursepoints, 3 Coursepoints have the special status to be "Navigation Points" TTS announced with symbol display in Navigation_Button
Left Direction by Coursepoint <PointType> Left.
Right Direction by coursepoint <PointType> Right.
Straight Direction by coursepoint <PointType> Straight.
Gpx navigation_track and associated waypoints. A tcx clone by gpx.
Associated waypoints are Locus "Priority_Points" TTS announced with symbol display in "Navigation_button".
Out of ALL associated waypoints, 3 waypoints should have the special status to be "Navigation Points" TTS announced with symbol display in Navigation_Button.
Left Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White/Red OR Left.
Right Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White/Green OR Right.
Straight Direction by associated waypoint <sym> Navaid, White OR Straight.
In zip attachment test example files. Start Navigate (simulate). By actual Locus version 3.18.9.8.
- tcx course files with 2 additional Priority Points.
Navigation TTS announced and <Notes> of both Navigation and Priority_ Points as text display in the map top info bar.
- gpx navigation track with some additonal demo Priority Points.
* Actual version not recognising the 3 integrated L/R/S 'Navigation_Points", Locus adds own generated instructions :-(( Also does not display the <desc> information of points into the maps top information bar :-((
* Displays ALL (= more than +16) standard known waypoints Icons (Locus Priority Points) in the Navigation Button :-))
More info: http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
Sounds like a good idea to have general "free" waypoints and "special" navigation "priority points" supported from the same gpx file!
Also, this could eventually lead to a more general gpx format "standard" for navigation purposes without the need of special app-specific extensions -> better interoperability between apps (if they implement support for it).
Sounds like a good idea to have general "free" waypoints and "special" navigation "priority points" supported from the same gpx file!
Also, this could eventually lead to a more general gpx format "standard" for navigation purposes without the need of special app-specific extensions -> better interoperability between apps (if they implement support for it).
gpx navigation by the waypoint association method.
A most actual report comparing Locus tcx/gpx navigation.
http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
gpx navigation by the waypoint association method.
A most actual report comparing Locus tcx/gpx navigation.
http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
Hello guys,
I'll probably needs some help here. As I see, topic has 19+ votes, which is nice and it means some interest in this topic.
Unfortunately base idea is still not perfectly clear to me. As I understand it:
Base idea: import file with track and waypoints and use certain waypoints as navigation commands, correct?
Current situation:
TCX file format: course + coursePoints are well supported and should work without a problems now. Why? TCX course format is directly made for this purpose
GPX file format: no united official support for navigation over this format. Same problem discussed in BRouter support forum. Almost every navi software export own version.
So, if I understand correctly, TCX support is done. GPX except street names also. So question: WHY to add precise support for GPX, when there is no universal format and also no desktop app that may generate compatible GPX files?? And please, 19 votes = 19 interested people, so I'll appreciate some short feedback, thanks!
Hello guys,
I'll probably needs some help here. As I see, topic has 19+ votes, which is nice and it means some interest in this topic.
Unfortunately base idea is still not perfectly clear to me. As I understand it:
Base idea: import file with track and waypoints and use certain waypoints as navigation commands, correct?
Current situation:
TCX file format: course + coursePoints are well supported and should work without a problems now. Why? TCX course format is directly made for this purpose
GPX file format: no united official support for navigation over this format. Same problem discussed in BRouter support forum. Almost every navi software export own version.
So, if I understand correctly, TCX support is done. GPX except street names also. So question: WHY to add precise support for GPX, when there is no universal format and also no desktop app that may generate compatible GPX files?? And please, 19 votes = 19 interested people, so I'll appreciate some short feedback, thanks!
No worry Menion. Idea is practically implemented by evolution.
Tcx by associated Coursepoint = perfectly Implemented.
Gpx by associated Waypoints = nearly finished in Locus, just misses that finishing touch in the nav implementation itself.
Only small issue is: The gpx <desc> attribute is not that nicely supported as in Locus perfect tcx <Notes> implementation/examle. That is all !
See picture in http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
I hope that picture tcx versus gpx coursepoints list clears all up.
Otherwise this idea: = Completed !
(My congrats, and thanks for your efforts to even support a "non standard" but promising gpx method).
(btw...I can easily custom edit by gpx pc editor program.) On some occasions a little bit easier to do than on smartphone even when method is not a standardised system.
No worry Menion. Idea is practically implemented by evolution.
Tcx by associated Coursepoint = perfectly Implemented.
Gpx by associated Waypoints = nearly finished in Locus, just misses that finishing touch in the nav implementation itself.
Only small issue is: The gpx <desc> attribute is not that nicely supported as in Locus perfect tcx <Notes> implementation/examle. That is all !
See picture in http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=4178.msg42614#msg42614
I hope that picture tcx versus gpx coursepoints list clears all up.
Otherwise this idea: = Completed !
(My congrats, and thanks for your efforts to even support a "non standard" but promising gpx method).
(btw...I can easily custom edit by gpx pc editor program.) On some occasions a little bit easier to do than on smartphone even when method is not a standardised system.
Replies have been locked on this page!